You must be logged-in and have sufficient BillHop credit in order to edit or comment on this page.
Rick Perry Fast-Tracks Coal Power Plants
UPDATE: On February 20, 2007, Judge Stephen Yelenosky issued a ruling granting a temporary injunction to end the State Office of Administrative Hearings' (SOAH) adherence to the Governor's executive order. This judgment comes one day before the formal hearing on the merits for 6 of the proposed TXU permits was to begin.
On February 21, the administrative law judges at SOAH postponed the TXU hearings until June 27, 2007. This will give the parties more opportunities to conduct limited discovery and prepare their cases for and against the permits.
_______
Rick Perry issued an executive order in 2005 that fast-tracks the contested case hearing process for coal-fired power plants in Texas. The contested case hearing is the formal venue through which citizens are legally able to protest these permits.
Through the process of a contested case hearing protestants have the opportunity to analyze the proposed permit applications, gather evidence (through a discovery process) and present a formal case that identifies how the application or proposed permit is deficient. This process takes places before an administrative law judge at the State Office of Administrative Hearings (SOAH).
At the end of the hearing process, the administrative law judge then makes a recommendation to the 3 Commissioners of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to grant the permit, deny the permit, or grant the permit with modifications that are, hopefully, more protective of the public. The Commission then has the final say on whether to accept the recommendations of the administrative law judge.
A case of this kind involves many steps and usually takes between 9 and 11 months. Rick Perry has said that this process should take 6. In a practical sense, this is an awful squeeze of time and resources for those citizen and groups who wish to formally protest the permit. With 18 new proposed power plants (11 by TXU alone), all coming down the pike in this same window, protestants are slammed. The week of October 30th, 5 of TXU's proposed power plants began the contested case hearing process. This fast-tracking and overloading of applications is a deliberate move to overwhelm protestants and make the coal plants a done-deal.
The contested case hearing process takes time and money on both sides, but even when permits are finally issued, it is often the case that they have been improved by the process.
Links and References
Environmental Defense's stoptxu.com contains more information and maps of the locations of the proposed plants.TXU's Powering the Future of Texas plan ReliableTexasPower.com
Goodwyn, Wade "Critics Blast Texas Plans for New 'Dirty' Coal Plants" NPR 9/25/06
Rick Perry Fast-Tracks Coal Power Plants
UPDATE: On February 20, 2007, Judge Stephen Yelenosky issued a ruling granting a temporary injunction to end the State Office of Administrative Hearings' adherence to the Governor's executive order. This judgment comes one day before the formal hearing on the merits for 6 of the proposed TXU permits was to begin.
_______
Rick Perry issued an executive order in 2005 that fast-tracks the contested case hearing process for coal-fired power plants in Texas. The contested case hearing is the formal venue through which citizens are legally able to protest these permits.
Through the process of a contested case hearing protestants have the opportunity to analyze the proposed permit applications, gather evidence (through a discovery process) and present a formal case that identifies how the application or proposed permit is deficient. This process takes places before an administrative law judge at the State Office of Administrative Hearings (SOAH).
At the end of the hearing process, the administrative law judge then makes a recommendation to the 3 Commissioners of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to grant the permit, deny the permit, or grant the permit with modifications that are, hopefully, more protective of the public. The Commission then has the final say on whether to accept the recommendations of the administrative law judge.
A case of this kind involves many steps and usually takes between 9 and 11 months. Rick Perry has said that this process should take 6. In a practical sense, this is an awful squeeze of time and resources for those citizen and groups who wish to formally protest the permit. With 18 new proposed power plants (11 by TXU alone), all coming down the pike in this same window, protestants are slammed. The week of October 30th, 5 of TXU's proposed power plants began the contested case hearing process. This fast-tracking and overloading of applications is a deliberate move to overwhelm protestants and make the coal plants a done-deal.
The contested case hearing process takes time and money on both sides, but even when permits are finally issued, it is often the case that they have been improved by the process.
Links and References
Environmental Defense's stoptxu.com contains more information and maps of the locations of the proposed plants.TXU's Powering the Future of Texas plan ReliableTexasPower.com
Goodwyn, Wade "Critics Blast Texas Plans for New 'Dirty' Coal Plants" NPR 9/25/06
Rick Perry Fast-Tracks Coal Power Plants
Rick Perry issued an executive order in 2005 that fast-tracks the contested case hearing process for coal-fired power plants in Texas. The contested case hearing is the formal venue through which citizens are legally able to protest these permits.Through the process of a contested case hearing protestants have the opportunity to analyze the proposed permit applications, gather evidence (through a discovery process) and present a formal case that identifies how the application or proposed permit is deficient. The administrative law judge then makes a recommendation the 3 Commissioners of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to grant the permit, deny the permit, or grant the permit with modifications that are, hopefully, more protective of the public. The Commission then has the final say on whether to accept the recommendations of the administrative law judge.
A case of this kind involves many steps and usually takes between 9 and 11 months. Rick Perry has said that this process should take 6. In a practical sense, this is an awful squeeze of time and resources for those citizen and groups who wish to formally protest the permit. With 18 new proposed power plants (11 by TXU alone), all coming down the pike in this same window, protestants are slammed. The week of October 30th, 5 of TXU's proposed power plants began the contested case hearing process. This fast-tracking and overloading of applications is a deliberate move to overwhelm protesants and make the coal plants a done-deal.
The contested case hearing process takes time and money on both sides, but even when permits are finally issued, it is often the case that they have been improved by the process.
Links and References
Environmental Defense's stoptxu.com contains more information and maps of the locations of the proposed plants.TXU's Powering the Future of Texas plan ReliableTexasPower.com
Goodwyn, Wade "Critics Blast Texas Plans for New 'Dirty' Coal Plants" NPR 9/25/06
Rick Perry Fast-Tracks Coal Power Plants
Rick Perry issued an executive order in 2005 that fast-tracks the contested case hearing process for coal-fired power plants in Texas. The contested case hearing is the formal venue through which citizens are legally able to protest these permits.Through the process of a contested case hearing protestants have the opportunity to analyze the proposed permit applications, gather evidence (through a discovery process) and present a formal case that identifies how the application or proposed permit is deficient. The administrative law judge then makes a recommendation the 3 Commissioners of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to grant the permit, deny the permit, or grant the permit with modifications that are, hopefully, more protective of the public. The Commission then has the final say on whether to accept the recommendations of the administrative law judge.
A case of this kind involves many steps and usually takes between 9 and 11 months. Rick Perry has said that this process should take 6. In a practical sense, this is an awful squeeze of time and resources for those citizen and groups who wish to formally protest the permit. With 18 new proposed power plants (11 by TXU alone), all coming down the pike in this same window, protestants are slammed. The week of October 30th, 5 of TXU's proposed power plants began the contested case hearing process. This fast-tracking and overloading of applications is a deliberate move to overwhelm protesants and make the coal plants a done-deal.
The contested case hearing process takes time and money on both sides, but even when permits are finally issued, it is often the case that they have been improved by the process.
Links and References
Environmental Defense's stoptxu.com contains more information and maps of the locations of the proposed plants.Goodwyn, Wade "Critics Blast Texas Plans for New 'Dirty' Coal Plants" NPR 9/25/06
Rick Perry Fast-Tracks Coal Power Plants
Rick Perry issued an executive order in 2005 that fast-tracks the contested case hearing process for coal-fired power plants in Texas. The contested case hearing is the formal venue through which citizens are legally able to protest these permits.
It is through the process of the contested case hearing that protestants have the opportunity to analyze the proposed permit applications, gather evidence (through a discovery process) and present a formal case that identifies how the application or proposed permit is deficient. The administrative law judge then makes a recommendation the 3 Commissioners of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to grant the permit, deny the permit, or grant the permit with modifications that are, hopefully, more protective of the public. The Commission then has the final say on whether to accept the recommendations of the administrative law judge.
A case of this kind involves many steps and usually takes between 9 and 11 months. Rick Perry has said that this process should take 6. In a practical sense, this is an awful squeeze of time and resources for those citizen and groups who wish to formally protest the permit. With 18 new proposed power plants (11 by TXU alone), all coming down the pike in this same window, protestants are slammed. This week, the week of October 30th, 5 of TXU's proposed power plants began the contested case hearing process. This fast-tracking and overloading of applications is a deliberate move to overwhelm protesants and make the coal plants a done-deal.
The contested case hearing process takes time and money on both sides, but even when permits are finally issued, it is often the case that they have been improved by the process.
For a link to more information and maps of the locations of the proposed plants see [LINK http://www.stoptxu.com LINK].
Rick Perry Fast-Tracks Coal Power Plants
Rick Perry issued an executive order in 2005 that fast-tracks the contested case hearing process for coal-fired power plants in Texas. The contested case hearing is the formal venue through which citizens are legally able to protest these permits.
It is through the process of the contested case hearing that protestants have the opportunity to analyze the proposed permit applications, gather evidence (through a discovery process) and present a formal case that identifies how the application or proposed permit is deficient. The administrative law judge then makes a recommendation the 3 Commissioners of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to grant the permit, deny the permit, or grant the permit with modifications that are, hopefully, more protective of the public. The Commission then has the final say on whether to accept the recommendations of the administrative law judge.
A case of this kind involves many steps and usually takes between 9 and 11 months. Rick Perry has said that this process should take 6. In a practical sense, this is an awful squeeze of time and resources for those citizen and groups who wish to formally protest the permit. With 18 new proposed power plants (11 by TXU alone), all coming down the pike in this same window, protestants are slammed (Editor: Need specific location info on these proposed plants). This week, the week of October 30th, 5 of TXU's proposed power plants began the contested case hearing process. This fast-tracking and overloading of applications is a deliberate move to overwhelm protesants and make the coal plants a done-deal.
The contested case hearing process takes time and money on both sides, but even when permits are finally issued, it is often the case that they have been improved by the process.
Rick Perry Fast-Tracks Coal Power Plants
Rick Perry issued an executive order in 2005 that fast-tracks the contested case hearing process for coal-fired power plants in Texas. The contested case hearing is the formal venue through which citizens are legally able to protest these permits.
It is through the process of the contested case hearing that protestants have the opportunity to analyze the proposed permit applications, gather evidence (through a discovery process) and present a formal case that identifies how the application or proposed permit is deficient. The administrative law judge then makes a recommendation the 3 Commissioners of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to grant the permit, deny the permit, or grant the permit with modifications that are, hopefully, more protective of the public. The Commission then has the final say on whether to accept the recommendations of the administrative law judge.
A case of this kind involves many steps and usually takes between 9 and 11 months. Rick Perry has said that this process should take 6. In a practical sense, this is an awful squeeze of time and resources for those citizen and groups who wish to formally protest the permit. With 18 new proposed power plants (11 by TXU alone), all coming down the pike in this same window, protestants are slammed (less thanigreater thanEditor: Need specific location info on these proposed plantsless than/igreater than). This week, the week of October 30th, 5 of TXU's proposed power plants began the contested case hearing process. This fast-tracking and overloading of applications is a deliberate move to overwhelm protesants and make the coal plants a done-deal.
The contested case hearing process takes time and money on both sides, but even when permits are finally issued, it is often the case that they have been improved by the process.
Rick Perry Fast-Tracks Coal Power Plants
Rick Perry issued an executive order in 2005 that fast-tracks the contested case hearing process for coal-fired power plants in Texas. The contested case hearing is the formal venue through which citizens are legally able to protest these permits.
It is through the process of the contested case hearing that protestants have the opportunity to analyze the proposed permit applications, gather evidence (through a discovery process) and present a formal case that identifies how the application or proposed permit is deficient. The administrative law judge then makes a recommendation the 3 Commissioners of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to grant the permit, deny the permit, or grant the permit with modifications that are, hopefully, more protective of the public. The Commission then has the final say on whether to accept the recommendations of the administrative law judge.
A case of this kind involves many steps and usually takes between 9 and 11 months. Rick Perry has said that this process should take 6. In a practical sense, this is an awful squeeze of time and resources for those citizen and groups who wish to formally protest the permit. With 18 new proposed power plants (11 by TXU alone), all coming down the pike in this same window, protestants are slammed. This week, the week of October 30th, 5 of TXU's proposed power plants began the contested case hearing process. This fast-tracking and overloading of applications is a deliberate move to overwhelm protesants and make the coal plants a done-deal.
The contested case hearing process takes time and money on both sides, but even when permits are finally issued, it is often the case that they have been improved by the process.
Rick Perry Fast-Tracks Coal Power Plants
Rick Perry issued an executive order in 2005 that fast-tracks the contested case hearing process for coal-fired power plants in Texas. The contested case hearing is the formal venue through which citizens are legally able to protest these permits.
It is through the process of the contested case hearing that protestants have the opportunity to analyze the proposed permit applications, gather evidence (through a discovery process) and present a formal case that identifies how the application or proposed permit is deficient. The administrative law judge then makes a recommendation the 3 Commissioners of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to grant the permit, deny the permit, or grant the permit with modifications that are, hopefully, more protective of the public. The Commission then has the final say on whether to accept the recommendations of the administrative law judge.
A case of this kind involves many steps and usually takes between 9 and 11 months. Rick Perry has said that this process should take 6. In a practical sense, this is an awful squeeze of time and resources for those citizen and groups who wish to formally protest the permit. With 18 new proposed power plants (11 by TXU alone), all coming down the pike in this same window, protestants are slammed. This week, the week of October 30th, 5 of TXU's proposed power plants began the contested case hearing process. This fast-tracking and overloading of applications is a deliberate move to overwhelm protesants and make the coal plants a done-deal.
The contested case hearing process takes time and money on both sides, but even when permits are finally issued, it is often the case that they have been improved by the process.
Most Recommended Version
| Login to recommend or downrate a wiki page.Rick Perry Fast-Tracks Coal Power Plants
Rick Perry issued an executive order in 2005 that fast-tracks the contested case hearing process for coal-fired power plants in Texas. The contested case hearing is the formal venue through which citizens are legally able to protest these permits.
It is through the process of the contested case hearing that protestants have the opportunity to analyze the proposed permit applications, gather evidence (through a discovery process) and present a formal case that identifies how the application or proposed permit is deficient. The administrative law judge then makes a recommendation the 3 Commissioners of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to grant the permit, deny the permit, or grant the permit with modifications that are, hopefully, more protective of the public. The Commission then has the final say on whether to accept the recommendations of the administrative law judge.
A case of this kind involves many steps and usually takes between 9 and 11 months. Rick Perry has said that this process should take 6. In a practical sense, this is an awful squeeze of time and resources for those citizen and groups who wish to formally protest the permit. With 18 new proposed power plants (11 by TXU alone), all coming down the pike in this same window, protestants are slammed. This week, the week of October 30th, 5 of TXU's proposed power plants began the contested case hearing process. This fast-tracking and overloading of applications is a deliberate move to overwhelm protesants and make the coal plants a done-deal.
The contested case hearing process takes time and money on both sides, but even when permits are finally issued, it is often the case that they have been improved by the process.
Rick Perry Fast-Tracks Coal Power Plants
Rick Perry issued an executive order in 2005 that fast-tracks the contested case hearing process for coal-fired power plants in Texas. The contested case hearing is the formal venue through which citizens are legally able to protest these permits.
It is through the process of the contested case hearing that protestants have the opportunity to analyze the proposed permit applications, gather evidence (through a discovery process) and present a formal case that identifies how the application or proposed permit is deficient. The administrative law judge then makes a recommendation the 3 Commissioners of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to grant the permit, deny the permit, or grant the permit with modifications that are, hopefully, more protective of the public. The Commission then has the final say on whether to accept the recommendations of the administrative law judge.
A case of this kind involves many steps and usually takes between 9 and 11 months. Rick Perry has said that this process should take 6. In a practical sense, this is an awful squeeze of time and resources for those citizen and groups who wish to formally protest the permit. With 18 new proposed power plants (11 by TXU alone), all coming down the pike in this same window, protestants are slammed. This week, the week of October 30th, 5 of TXU's proposed power plants began the contested case hearing process. This fast-tracking and overloading of applications is a deliberate move to overwhelm protesants and make the coal plants a done-deal.
The contested case hearing process takes time and money on both sides, but even when permits are finally issued, it is often the case that they have been improved by the process. Rick Perry doesn't believe that regular citizens should have a decent opportunity to protest permits that will affect them. He cares more for his cronies than the people.
Additional Links
Please login to embed videos on this page.





Warning: array_reverse() [function.array-reverse]: The argument should be an array in /home/.bernadine/dbrockmann/www.billhop.com/class/BHHelper.php on line 84